Long SMCI, short SHOP, same sector: $1 of SMCI against $1.68 of SHOP, sized so that a typical day moves each leg by about the same amount. The spread is -88.5% over the last 120 sessions, +8.3% over the last 20, and today's level sits at the 8th percentile of its own path, deeply compressed, narrowing over the last ten sessions. Alpha 14 against 22, a gap of -8 points (+9 ten sessions ago). Net market exposure at this sizing: +0.04, a clean relative bet. Same sector, not true peers on the desk's test.
Not on the desk's list as of Nov 10, three sessions behind. Pro sees today's list.
The last 9 times these two sat this far below their one-year average, 4 closed half the gap within ten sessions. No hand-off in view: neither leg is where a cycle pair starts.
One line of your account split $1 : $1.68 across the legs at the last close (SMCI $27.00, SHOP $146.83); fractions included. Arithmetic on a setting you choose, not a recommendation.
The house book has not closed a trade in this pair.
The house takes every listed cycle pair by the rules, after average trading costs; its full record is on the engine page. Pairs you assemble yourself are ideas, not posted trades: the Hedge pairs chapter says how the two differ.
Each leg against its sector fund, and each leg's true peers.
How to read it: the spread is what $1 long SMCI and $1.68 short SHOP would have made together, in percent of the long leg, close to close, before costs; the market's move cancels in it to the extent the two legs share it. Stretch is where today's level sits among the last 120 sessions of that path, a description of the spread's own history and not a forecast. Net β is the pair's remaining market exposure per $1 long at this sizing (each leg's beta over 250 sessions). The pages for SMCI and SHOP carry each leg on its own.